Productized service · Delivery system

Automation Profit Audit: turning one workflow into a build-ready decision

A repeatable five-day analysis system for deciding whether one business workflow is worth automating—and what the first controlled build should contain.

Request the audit
Status
Available service
Scope
One workflow
Fee
Fixed €490
Output
Decision package

A specific problem, fully framed.

Automation conversations often jump from a frustrating task to a tool recommendation. That leaves workload, exceptions, system boundaries, human approvals, and economic assumptions unresolved.

Kastovia needed an entry engagement small enough to buy confidently but structured enough to support a real implementation decision.

Design the operating system, not only the interface.

The audit is a delivery system rather than a client case study. It uses a fixed sequence to map the current state, model workload and cost, define a target workflow, and isolate the first build scope.

01

Inputs before tools

Volume, handling time, roles, systems, errors, and exceptions are established first.

02

Assumptions visible

Illustrative estimates remain clearly separated from confirmed client inputs.

03

Control retained

Human review, failure handling, and named ownership are designed into the target state.

What can be seen and verified.

01 / Current stateActors, systems, handoffs, delays, and exceptions.
02 / Business caseWorkload, cost, benefit range, and stated assumptions.
03 / Target stateAutomation steps, review controls, and failure paths.
04 / First scopeA prioritized implementation package and readout.

This describes Kastovia’s productized methodology. It does not represent a named client result or promise a savings outcome.

A bounded outcome with visible limits.

The finished system creates four written artifacts plus a 45-minute executive readout. Implementation remains optional, and payment is requested only after Kastovia confirms that the submitted workflow fits the scope.

Request the audit

Illustrative report preview

A decision package, not a vague deck.

This fictional order-intake example shows the level of structure. Every real audit uses the client’s confirmed inputs and assumptions.

01 / Executive findingManual intake absorbs 31 hours each month.

Three sources, two re-keying steps, and inconsistent exception handling create the largest avoidable cost.

02 / Current state
EmailSheetCRM

Actors, tools, handoffs, delays, rework, and exceptions mapped in one view.

03 / Target stateAutomate capture. Keep approval human.

Structured intake and validation reduce handling while a named owner retains the final decision.

Submit a workflow for review